back to postings list

Sport v Art - A personal perspective and provocation

Posted by Jamie Beddard, Friday 4th March, 2011

As arts-practitioner and sports-goer, these respective arenas of ‘blood, sweat and tears’, have both, played significant roles in my 40-odd(!) years on this planet, and are inextricably linked to my lifestyle and identity. If, as I believe, we are born as blank pages, to be shaded by our every experience, much of my biography would be given over to doing art and watching sport. Theatre is my art of choice, whilst Ipswich Town Football Town are my sporting albatross.

In crude terms, I make a meagre living though art, whilst blowing much of my ‘not so’ disposable income watching sport. Unfortunately, it’s not the other way round. I would be a good deal richer, and slightly more refined. However, due to a complete lack of sporting prowess I was destined to inhabit a humble artist’s garret, rather than enjoying the excess and vulgarity of a palatial ‘Hello magazine’ pad.

I try not to think about, or quantify the time, energy and money spent following football for fear that intervention may be required to ‘cure’ me. Watching grown men haplessly kick a pigs-bladder around a muddy field, could well be interpreted as a self-fulfilling desire for disappointment, an eroticisation of the non-disabled form or simply a chronic waste of time. Having undergone a number of unsuccessful and pointless ‘interventions’ in my past – leg-straightening, voice improving, buoyancy aiding - this particular one may actually have real benefit. In the meantime, I shall continue to spend Saturdays traipsing around the country, witnessing sad spectacles I would never contemplate taking part in myself. Where are ‘the men in white coats’ when you need them!

In many ways, it is the apparent senselessness of finding yourself stranded at Doncaster station at midnight following another tepid defeat that keeps me hooked. Sport, and the associated experiences, have an immediacy and transiency that allows us to escape our daily grind or worries, or in the case of Doncaster incident, replace these with a completely fresh set of interesting problems and hurdles. Rather than worrying about money we hurl abuse at hapless referees, rather than upsetting the applecart at work we jump around like 4-year olds when the ball hits the back of a net. We are offered the chance to forget, to shout and to escape, lost in a visceral soap opera being played out in real time, infinite in possibilities. And, of course, we are part of a crowd, a community with all that can entail; collective strength, anonymity, devolving responsibility, hysteria and camaraderie.

Arts too is ‘infinite in possibilities’, but as an artist my work is about making sense of the world I inhabit, saying what is important to me and attempting to impact on the enormous world around me. I am, to a certain extent, controlling the possibilities, picking and choosing the materials and means that will best convey my message. Good art is introspective, soul searching and, dare I say it, brave. It is the individual drawing back from the crowd, putting their marker in the sand, saying ‘this is what I believe; this is what I stand for.’

I have been asked to make theatre about my sporting passions; a marriage made in heaven, enjoyment under the auspices of work. However, despite my best endeavours, I have singularly failed to connect these two passions which fulfil such different roles in my life. They operate in different parts of my psyche – one part needing to be lost in the crowd, the other needing to step away from the crowd. They appear mutually exclusive, and yet equally important and to my day-to-day life. An actor friend has a clause in his contracts stating that he will not perform while Wales are playing Rugby Union. Unfortunately, my relative lack of artistic success precludes such riders in my own contract negotiations.

Whilst writing this article I put a Sports v Arts question on Facebook. In straightforward terms, Art won 12-10, whilst the debate provoked pearls of wisdom including, ‘need you ask’, ‘art is coveted and hoarded as a commodity’, ‘sport divides people into winners and losers….in art everyone’s a winner’, ‘good sport is art’, ‘spart’, ‘each can be uplifting or tedious’, ‘I’d like to hear a gallery crowd singing ‘Who’s the sculpture in the black…’, ‘coffee is better than tea…except for old people’ . Of course, the beauty of the world we live is the subtle shading, interweaving and fluidity of our ideas, identities and preferences. Art and sport are not mutually exclusive, and interact with people on numerous different levels, and play crucial roles in enabling us to make sense, and enjoy the world around us.

Who would ask such a daft question as, ‘Which is better – Sport or Art?’!

Comments

Thursday 17th March, 2011

Colin Hambrook

Great blog Jamie! I used to go to the occasional football match when I was young. I can see the attraction - the atmosphere and excitement that watching sport on telly never really quite engages with - even in a crowded pub amongst lots of enthusiastic fans. I've always been an arty person. I don't think I had any choice. It was about survival as much as anything.

Much as I would like to think art isn't competitive I know it is. And in ways that are often less honest than in sport. For one thing there is the competition involved in being attractive to funders and sponsors. There is a bureaucratic language you have to learn, which is often actually at a direct counterpoint to creativity. Many artists or creative people with aspirations to get their work on the circuit, feel excluded as a result of not knowing that language.

There is a culture of elitism, particularly in visual arts. It is often disability-related. After all a very high percentage of visual artists have dyslexia. Visualising in three dimensions is a characteristic of the dyslexic brain. Great for art and architecture. Not so easy when it comes to dealing with words on the page. On top of this, there has been a tradition in art school training of encouraging the use of exclusive language which no-one understands… very often including the writer!

‘The Language of Art’ that you have to understand to get through art school, is an insidious form of competitive, manufacturing of favour. The language comes from a tradition, which has been deliberately obscure in order to cover the tracks of the collectors and patrons exerting their influence to find ways of raising the prices of the work of particular artists they have favoured. Not to say it’s not good art; just that the competitive values which raise it to celebrity status actually often kill the creativity of the artist. How many famous artists have had more than one good idea in their work?!

One of the big strengths of accentuate, of disability art and of outsider art has been the aspiration to create a level playing field in which everyone is valued and can take part.

In recent years I’ve been particularly impressed by Outside In – a project that has come out of Pallant House Gallery in Chichester which is about to become a program with an impact on a national level. Outside In cuts through that requirement that your artists’ statement has to place your work within a Fine Art tradition for it to be seen in a gallery. The value is put on the work and what it expresses, not the words used to justify it.

Add a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear immediately.

Your e-mail address will not be revealed to the public.
HTML is forbidden, but line-breaks will be retained.
This can be a URL of an image or a YouTube, MySpaceTV or a Flickr page (we'll handle the media embedding from there!)
This is to prevent automatic submissions.

© Copyright 2024 Screen South · copyright statement

Site by Surface Impression